deforestation caused by human activity happening in many parts of the world, with series of results for the environment.
what do you think can be done to solve this problem?
In myriad parts of the world, human behaviors affect the habitat. Some would argue that this situation could not be stopped. However, in my opinion, many solutions are revolving around the issue that may stable the environment against this kind of problem.
One possible approach would be for people who replace computers with paper. A good illustration for this is companies which archive their document on computers. This would approximately curb some problems quickly, although this may be expensive and difficult.
A more feasible approach for deforestation would be for governments that inhibit it by legislation. In fact, let’s take the example of rules which have obvious effects on deforestation. This would be possible for many countries that rules run. This is because countries which by spilling fuels try to dry trees and put the building instead of them.
The most rational justification is when the chief aim of people and governments is when they rob themselves. Simply put, governments want to reforestation the jungle so in addition to some rule they increase the people acknowledgment by commercial and etc. In this situation, in no way do they think that would belittle deforestation, and so put forward a reforestation idea. to put it differently, individuals endure themselves and determine to use other aspects in front of the wood, such as; using stones for their building and computer or other accessories for keeping some notes while they have Financial support from their government.
It is true that the problem of deforestation happens in many countries by individuals but, it would not be far-fetched to hold the view that there are some people who flock to replace other materials instead of the wood based on the axiomatic and salient argument that I think it is absolutely worthwhile.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-25 | pouyamirani | 78 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- For all children the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write How far do you agree with this suggestion How important is it for a child to learn to play a musical instrument in your view 56
- For all children the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write How far do you agree with this suggestion How important is it for a child to learn to play a musical instrument in your view 56
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 81
- For all children the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write How far do you agree with this suggestion How important is it for a child to learn to play a musical instrument in your view 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...the people acknowledgment by commercial and etc. In this situation, in no way do they th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 376, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...nd so put forward a reforestation idea. to put it differently, individuals endure ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, while, i think, in addition, in fact, kind of, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18644067797 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98137472171 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562711864407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4684580703 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230190405452 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820106781143 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548466332124 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137884731934 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494076273159 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.