People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
It is widely believed that raising the cost of fuel is one solution from the government to address the environmental issues. Personally, I disagree with the this measure because I believe that other factors are equally important
On the one hand, increasing the price of fuel brings some benefits. Firstly, it can help reduce the environmental pollution to some degree. In other words, the excessive use of private cars which releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere would be limited so encourage the utilization of public transports. Therefore, this measure would cut down on emissions from vehicles to impede the process of global warming and reduce the greenhouse effect. Secondly, the citizens are forced to lead greener life if the cost of fuel increase. It means that they have greater sense of saving energy in household activities such as air conditioning, heating, cooking and so on as well as in manufacturing operations by applying more environmentally friendly technology.
Nevertheless, I believe that higher cost of fuel, higher cost of production because the production lines are primarily depends on machines powered by fuel. For this reason, the inhabitants, especially ones living in poverty-stricken countries may struggle with more expensive goods. As a result, if the cost of fuel increase, it may fairly impact on some fields related such as mechanical industry, logistics and the general price of the market. Moreover, raising the cost of fuel are unable to exhaustively solve the world’s environmental problems as the world’s population keep climbing rapidly. Therefore, the government should invest more in renewable energy sources such as wind, solar rather than non-renewable resources like coal or fuel.
In conclusion, while increasing cost of fuel brings some positive effects; however this measure still exist some drawbacks that should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...tal issues. Personally, I disagree with the this measure because I believe that other fa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...his reason, the inhabitants, especially ones living in poverty-stricken countries ma...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45918367347 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01929140659 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2550778875 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.461538462 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8461538462 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265114136631 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843863962009 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466781131092 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148709008821 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329161509825 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.