The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The pie chart represents the information about what was done by Anthropology students after graduating from the university and the table provides the data about the wages of anthropologists after 5 years of experience.
Overall, It is clear that the majority of the graduates started working full-time after the completion of the degree course and after getting work experience of 5 years most of the anthropologists are earning well in the government sector and freelancing services.
It is conspicuous from the illustration is that over half of the undergraduates chose to work full-time after graduation. In addition to this, 15% of the graduates selected to work part-time and 12% of the students were unemployed. Interestingly, among the degree holders, only 5% of the graduates started postgrad study along with the part-time job. The students who embarked studying the full-time postgrad course and unknown were similar with 8%.
The government sector is the only type of employment that had the 50% of anthropologist's salaries over $100,00 after 5 years of experience among other types of employment. However, the Government sectors and freelance consultants provided the same wages except for the proportion of people getting salaries in the range of $75000 to 100000+. The private sector provided the least salaries among other sectors, only 30% of the anthropologies are able to obtain salary over 10000. Conversely, the people who are getting salary in between $50000 to $74999 is higher(35%) in private sectors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- Map shows construction of 2014 and planning of 2020 80
- A friend has written to you asking for advice about a problem at work You have had a similar problem in the past Write a reply to your friend In your letter Tell your friend you understand the problem Explain what happened to you in the past Suggest possi 78
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation 55
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, well, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35833333333 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08112533554 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9803809143 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.6 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292310112011 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109793638388 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094387315843 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195774972177 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860939119317 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.