The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010
The given pie chart illustrates the differences in employment distribution across 3 distinctive categories in two town over a 50-year period.
Overall, it can be observed that the employment opportunities in the manufacturing field rose substantially in both places in comparision with the two others, which witnessed working percentage decline noticeably
Regarding town A, it was sales that allocated the most in 1960 with 41%, other careers like manufacturing and services had the pretty close percentages of workers which was around 30%. While in 2010, manufacturing began to be the most popular sector with 64% of total worker, higher than that in 1960 35%. The percentage of people working in sales and services just dropped to nearly half of it was in 1960, respectively 20% and 16%.
When it comes to town B, sales had a major role throughout a period of 50 years. Specifically, the ratio allocated to this job was account the most of both 2 charts, though there was a dramatical decrease, with 70% in 1960 and 53% in 2010. Besides, manufacturing only attract 10% workers in 1960, however, this figure went up significantly more than twice as higher in 1960 with 25% in 2010. While the proportion in citizens working in services keep remainable.
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map shows the development of the village 56
- The table below shows the production of cocoa beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 tonnes 67
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports and activity Discuss both view and give your opinion 61
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed working percentage decline noticeably Regarding town A, it was sales that allo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ice as higher in 1960 with 25% in 2010. While the proportion in citizens working in s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08173076923 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01674551683 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591346153846 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.3144869739 43.030603864 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 132.125 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3033423451 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117709317505 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584292044581 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168091480347 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487944995841 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.