Some people think that hosting international sports events is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
There has been an unsolved debate about whether an international sports festival will bring positive or negative effects on the host nations. The argued statement can be explained in several ways; I personally suppose that the drawbacks will dominate the benefits however.
The proponents may think of significant economic advantages for hosting such events. The first one is the promising development of the tourism industry. In fact, it can be denied that a global event like the World Cup or Olympic has a great potential for attracting tourists to the hosting country. During the festival, sports fans flock to the country in horde, which means the host can take advantage of this occasion to advertise their tradition as well as customs to the foreigners. Doing this well can establish a firm foundation for tourism after the event
finishes. Another key point to mention is a large number of job opportunities. The government of the host always needs to prepare carefully for everything from the infrastructure to the people, so it is a great requirement for the labour force to build a new stadium or guide visitors when the event is taking place.
On the other hand, holding such a big event can place a great financial burden on the national budget. In other words, to be eligible to host the event requires a country to prepare many aspects as mentioned above.
Limited time for preparation may lead to a state that copious money is mobilized hastily for the festival. The governors have to spare no expense to meet the requirements of the event, such as a stadium with standard capacity or staff to ensure the security during the festival when sports fans around the world converge on the host nation, which can become a source of stress for the budget while the budget is not sufficient and one of the reasons for national debt. Greece after the Athens 2004 Olympic Games is a case in point.At first, expected to be an economic opportunity for Greece, the country in economic troubles at the time, the games turned out a huge liability of 163 billions euro because the leaders were spendthrift on the infrastructure, most of which were left abandoned later.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that being a host of an international sports game has a positive influence on tourism. However, the financial problems that the host may face after the event convince me to believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mic advantages for hosting such events. The first one is the promising development ...
^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m foundation for tourism after the event finishes. Another key point to mention i...
^^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nishes. Another key point to mention is a large number of job opportunities. The government of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey point to mention is a large number of job opportunities. The government of the...
^^
Line 7, column 532, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...s 2004 Olympic Games is a case in point.At first, expected to be an economic oppor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94890510949 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77339606222 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540145985401 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.5124805872 49.4020404114 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.125 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6875 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182451008118 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607963864905 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389505324807 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918558876106 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296648040134 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.