The maps present changes that had taken place in Harborne town from 1936 to 2007.
Overall, the residential area had dramatically increased, while the infrastructure of the city was also markedly improved.
The most noticeable change was the addition of residencies to the right of the river in the northeast of the city. The southeast part of Harborne had been completely changed by converting the government offices into a museum and the farmland into a golf course. In addition, the cycle path, which ran from south to west, had been developed into a road, while additional two trees had been planted in the northwest of the town.
In terms of the city center, the post office, bank, and library remained unchanged over the period, while the sweet shop and butchers replaced with a super market and the flower shop had been converted to a travel agent. Furthermore, a large super-market had been constructed in the middle of the above amenities. However, all 4 roads, which connected the city center to the outskirt, had not been changed.
- Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people Some people say that younger people could be leaders Do you agree or disagree 67
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problem m 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement High school students should wear uniforms to schools 78
- The given maps show condition of Felixstone in 1967 and in 2001 73
- Unemployment is one of the biggest problems of contemporary society What do you think are the main causes of unemployment What solutions can you suggest 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97159090909 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72755088544 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596590909091 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4610098249 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0912237162839 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540923235637 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951542038746 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922396376266 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123030715802 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.