Should business hire employees for their entire lives?
In the modern era, whether employers should hire people for their entire lives raised a lot of debate among academicians. Some people hold the view that hiring employees for their entire lives can guarantee a lot of benefits for both employees and employers. However, others may take the opposite viewpoint and believe that if people are hired for a very long time, it will gradually have adverse effects on their performance. I personally believe that employees should be hired as long as they show their interest in their work and keep their efficiency high enough. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through some noticeable reasons.
My first reason and maybe the most important one is that if employers retain their employees for a very long time, it may gradually become tedious for them to work in the same situation every day. They have to get up at a fixed time, go to work in the way they always do, carry out the same duties, and communicate with the same people every day. I believe at some point, people need to experience new and different situations to improve themselves and develop their creativity and intelligence. Staying somewhere for a long time might make them bored with their present job and then this feeling prevent them from raising their efficiency and performance.
The second reason is that I think people should have the opportunity to broaden their perspectives. Although continuing to have the same job for a long time would offer them a stable promotion and work conditions, they may miss the chance to see the world and come into contact with a wide range of people from diverse backgrounds. Actually, interacting with new people not only can change our minds but also gives us a great experience we'll never forget. In addition, statistics show that changing the job will often lead to better working conditions and higher salaries. Therefore, from my point of view, people should not be afraid to change their job and encounter new challenges.
Finally, from my point of view, each company has limited things to learn. After a while, we are proficient enough at our job. Thus, we may feel as if we will waste our time there if we stay more. As we continue working there, nothing is added to our knowledge, which can make us disappointed and upset. Changing the job is like a shock and can bring about a lot of professional and emotional benefits for us.
To sum up, based on the aforementioned arguments there is a myriad of reasons that convince me to support the opinion that employees should not be employed for their entire life. Some of them, such as the need to improve creativity and wisdom, the opportunity to communicate with new people, better working conditions, and the chance to expand our knowledge, are mentioned above. However, that was like a story in a nutshell. Actually, there are some other reasons and examples challenging the claim, which are not mentioned above. All in all, I firmly believe that employees should have the opportunity to change their jobs to take advantage of the new position.
- Highways or public transportation 90
- Will you spend your money to buy a piece of jewelry or a ticket for a concert 70
- Why people do visit a museum 90
- Is daily homework necessary 70
- An airship is a type of aircraft that flies using a very large balloon filled with a lighter than air gas Airships were an important means of air transportation before the 1940s but are little used today having been largely replaced by airplanes and helic 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, i think, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2558.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 528.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8446969697 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6481336663 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467803030303 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 794.7 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5871418275 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.583333333 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95833333333 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317649387879 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960956403406 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127368159185 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186570441094 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163783811849 0.0645574589148 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.