Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
A highly contentious issue today relates to whether computers are considered the major technological development. I totally agree with this opinion because they help people connect with each other and offer some benefits to make life easier.
The main reason why I believe computers are the most important invention is that they bring everyone closer. A logical reason to support this is that with the explosive growth of the Internet, people now can use their computers to read online articles about world affairs, thereby keeping themselves updated with the occurrence. Additionally, individuals can contact one another via social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter, which is especially useful for families that spread over a wider geographical area. A recent surveyed data from the Science and Society magazine suggests that thanks to computers, families are able to keep connected despite living separately and it soothes the feeling of being in solitude. With all this taken into account, the creation of computers is of great importance.
Another reason why I support the notion that computers are cited to be the most significant accomplishment of mankind is that they can store vast amounts of information and reduce waste. One possible explanation for this is that computers are capable of containing massive amounts of data and documents. In other words, books, movies and pictures are stored digitally, leading to eliminating the need for paper used to make non-digital versions of the media. According to a recent report published in Environment magazine, the reduction in the rate of deforestation for paper has resulted in the regeneration of nearly 30% of the world's forests. That is why I agree that computers are no doubt to be the most essential invention.
In conclusion, my firm conviction is that computers are the most impactful invention in human history because it not only functions as a form of communication but also a useful tool to protect the contemporary world. The truth is that, until now or in the future, people can see the more advancement of this technology.
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 56
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 89
- Life expectancy is rising What are the causes and effects 89
- The use of social media such as Facebook and Instagram is replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- 2 Some people say it is a waste of time to plan for the future and that it is more important to focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 731, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubt to be the most essential invention. In conclusion, my firm conviction is tha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in conclusion, no doubt, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2389380531 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90952971501 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58407079646 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1017734834 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202995494721 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721721998878 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569385239565 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118089120481 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225815548446 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.