While it is believed that making a profit is a top priority of many organizations since it helps their businesses to stay afloat and keep their activities running smoothly, others argue that they should also have to take social responsibilities aside from solely aiming for financial gain. I totally agree with the latter idea.
While it is believed that making a profit is a top priority of many organizations since it helps their businesses to stay afloat and keep their activities running smoothly, others argue that they should also have to take social responsibilities aside from solely aiming for financial gain. I totally agree with the latter idea.
On the one hand, it is irrefutably that the world now is increasingly becoming competitive, thus it demands companies generate as much money as they could to survive. It is understandable that companies are always in favour of creating profits over the secondary social roles because they have to pay employees’ wages and payments for premises and utilities. On top of these costs, the competitive world requires them to put most of their finance to invest in innovations and improvements in order to be not falling behind their rivalries. If businesses fail to meet the turbulently changing need of customers or fail to pay their bills, any further social roles become irrelevant. By way of explanation, businesses are only able to contribute positively to society if they have a healthy financial background.
On the other hand, I am of the opinions that organizations should not be run solely with the aim of profitable maximization, since they have a larger role to play in society. With the growth and expansion of their businesses, they can help to lower the existing unemployment rate and increase the minimum salary for labour workers, which can help them to lead stable lives. Regarding social contribution as a whole. Companies can use, for example, a proportion of their revenues to fund local and national charities namely building more school for underprivileged children, supporting environmental initiatives such as climate change and so forth. Finally, executives in top organizations should be happy to contribute to society through the tax system instead of seeking ways to avoid it.
In conclusion, it is obvious to companies to aim for financial gain. However, I firmly believe that they should balance between making a profit and social responsibilities simultaneously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-11 | chinh11111 | 84 | view |
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 84
- Topic Some feel that movies and tv shows are a good way to study history despite their lack of historical accuracy to what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say learning history is a waste of time others believe it has a role to play in society Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- From your own understanding and experience what are the two significant factors that enable students to get a well paid job in the future 78
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become used to bad news and would it be better if more good news was reported 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, regarding, second, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25513196481 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13216799455 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574780058651 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0384420151 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456725463852 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133750723745 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.201463337157 0.0667982634062 302% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315761524348 0.151304729494 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.247064621985 0.056905535591 434% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.