All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks

All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks.
Cities are often considered as the developed parts of the countries where there are abundant of facilities available for people to relish. The given prompt that cities should invest minimum five percent for the conservation of existing parks seems an excellent approach for preserving the greenery in the city. I’m consonant about such implementation for the welfare of the environment.
The whole world is facing climate change due to the disturbance on the eco system. People have become self-centred to the extent that they do not even care for the environment they live in. Reckless deforestation, unplanned urbanization is traded for the huge amount of money and in return, the nature punish with the natural calamities such as drought, flood, etc. with a motive to bring back the ecosystem in balance the city should devote as much as they can to preserve the little park space .
City areas are mostly over-crowded with people and artificial technologies which can never take place of the nature. The park that inhabits large numbers of floras can add pulchritude to the city areas which can be a positive impact on city dwellers. Since people habituating in the city areas lack spacious space for retaining their spiritual calmness, in such cases, parks can fill the void they are lacking in their home. Parks are often utilized for the jogging purpose by the people which can help people to maintain healthy lifestyle. So for the inhabitants of the city who work real hard to pay taxes for the city government should be considered for the preservation of the parks as they can sustain healthy lifestyle with public space near them to enjoy the nature. Nature was and is still the best therapy the human who are inclined towards peace, solitary.
Some parks of some cities might possess historical value. For stance, there is a small park in a city which was built by some famous historians but if the park is in the verge of destruction and the city government is paying no attention to the conservation of the park then the city inhabitants might fail to preserve the history together with the park. In this case both the history and the nature are devastated and the consequences that might result from them are bigger than the expected.
In conclusion, parks hold immense importance to the people and the city itself as it can be a safe space for people to reconnect with the nature. With the unplanned urbanization that has resulted chaios on peoples’ life, park can be the cheapest therapy that can treat every inhabitants of the city equally so it should be preserved by the city government and should be renovated at the regular intervals.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the natural calamities such as drought, flood, etc. with a motive to bring back ...
^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ey can to preserve the little park space . City areas are mostly over-crowded wit...
^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he history and the nature are devastated and the consequences that might result f...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, well, at least, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2314.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91295116773 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63486760408 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48195329087 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6386143579 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.789473684 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7894736842 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36842105263 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336262143961 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118207505718 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193472288505 0.0758088955206 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262339606285 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.275850935554 0.0667264976115 413% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.