Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefits of human beings, while other argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are split opinions regarding animal slaughtering for lab, some people believe that it is good to slash animal for research; whereas, another group of thinkers support that it is not right to kill animals for our personal benefit. Therefore, both views are discussed in the ensuing paragraphs before coming to a plausible conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad reasons to believe that killing creature can save numerous human lives. The foremost one is that Homosapiens share the same genetics with few animals. In addition to that, the experimentation on them can show the various side effects and symptoms of new drugs or any treatment before injecting it into any human body. As a result, after making a few modifications in it we can test it on people; furthermore, it can prove a life-saving drug or medical procedure for an individual. As an epitome, according to a genetic research laboratory in new south wales suggested that human share 90% of the same genes with the rat. Hence, we can find the same results of certain drugs on both the body.
However, another pivotal facet of this argument is that animals are living things so they also have right to live. Firstly, it should be strictly prohibited to slash animals for our own selfish motive. secondly, in some culture and religion it is considered as a sin they worship animal as their god. Moreover, we need to save animals to live in harmony because they play a vital role in maintaining our ecological cycle.
In conclusion, it can be said that killing animals is a question that depends highly on the culture, ritual and mindset of an individual. However, according to my understanding and preference it can prove fruitful to humankind because one can find the cure for an ailment without losing any human life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-12 | vikasvaghasiya | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efore coming to a plausible conclusion. At the outset, there are myriad reasons ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...ash animals for our own selfish motive. secondly, in some culture and religion it is con...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90163934426 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72704511522 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56393442623 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.772535533 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201008214224 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635989465046 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586719155914 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129188172067 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907549829991 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.