Curbing bad behaviour at school has been a heated topic of controversy.Although there will undoubtedly be some detrimental consequences of this trend, school managers can take steps to mitigate this potential problem.
There are diffirent things which may affect students. One of the main causes of the problem is that bad hehaviour is due to the lack of discipline and structure. It is difficult to manage a large amount of students in a class. The disruptive students may continue to behave badly if they know that the rules is not stringent, and hence they will not be punished obviously. This explains why their behaviour is getting worse day by day. Another reason is that a lot of disruptive students come from unstable family backgrounds. Several parents are too lenient and spoil their kids. The reasons for that are either difficulty in giving a birth to a child or gender discrimination. These parents suppose that they cannot breed another children or male kids, which may lead to detrimental effects in bringing up their children such as bad behaviour. This view is, to some extent, justifiable lead to the fact that schools can do very little if they are not supportes by parents.
Based on the arguments cited above, there are several steps which can tackle this problem. Firstly, school managers need not only a clear code of conduct but also setting stringent rules about behaviour. They should teach young children moral values such as tolerance and sharing. Besides, reducing the number of students in classes would be beneficial for teachers to care his or her students. Secondly, parents should support the school rules and take responsibility for their children’s behaviour. Teaching children good behaviour at home as well as school allows them to become a good citizen in society.
In conclusion, it is essential to tackle the bad behaviours problem of students at school by combinating effort between schools and parents.
- The maps below changes in the Spanish city of Castellon in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparations where relevant 59
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 61
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram gives information about the process of making pulp and paper Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Although
... has been a heated topic of controversy.Although there will undoubtedly be some detrimen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od citizen in society. In conclusion, it is essential to tackle the bad behavi...
^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'behaviours'' or 'behaviour's'?
Suggestion: behaviours'; behaviour's
...ion, it is essential to tackle the bad behaviours problem of students at school by combin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.115625 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83672724885 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8437250571 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9444444444 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1503727531 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480389582667 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453843147099 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108368710798 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147345093009 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.