The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years
The line graph gives the information about the proportion pf waste production in 3 different companies from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it is clear that, in Company A and B, the rates pf waste produced experienced downward trend over the period shown, while the figure for Company C increased significantly between 2000 and 2015.
Looking at the details, the largest proportion of waste was produced with 12 tonnes in 2000 by Company A, and this figure decreased gradually to about 8 tonnes ath the end of the given period. Company B produced waste approximately 8 tonnes in 2000, and then this proportion reach a peak at about 10 tonnes in the following 5 year period before declining markedly to the end at just 3 tonnes.
Turning to the most striking trend, there was a drammatic increase in Company C throughout the period, especially between the first and third 5 year timescales with tonnes increased from about 4 at the beginning of the course to around 10 by the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph gives the information about the proporti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74456725497 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.0073164204 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.2 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241393504399 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145703417324 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410472623309 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151445896926 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461894172168 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.