The first chart below shows the number of British visitors to the US and American visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015. The second chart shows the amount spent by those visitors in that period
The first bar chart illustrates how many British tourists to the US and American travelers to the UK between 2011 and 2015, and the second bar chart demonstrates how much money visitors spent in the period in question.
Overall, looking at the two charts, it is immediately obvious that both the number of UK tourists coming to US and the proportion of their expenditure were higher than those of US people. It is also notable that, an upward trend was seen in the figure for the amount spent on tourism to the two countries in each one.
According to the first chart, the volume of UK people visiting the US was higher than that of the US tourists to the UK, with about 3250 thousand and 2750 thousand in 2011. Although there were slight declines in the number of UK and US visitors, with roughly 3000 in the former and 2500 in the latter in 2013, those figures gradually went up by about 500 thousand people at the end of the period shown.
With the respect to the expenditure by these tourists, the UK people spent nearly 4000 million on traveling to the US and the American’s expense of the UK tour was under 3000 million. There were relatively no changes in those figures until the year 2014 that witnessed a dramatic growth in the amount spent by these countries and they went on increasing steadily in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-15 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-19 | ncthanhloan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | yeu192 | 59 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | yeu192 | 84 | view |
- The first chart below shows the number of British visitors to the US and American visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015 The second chart shows the amount spent by those visitors in that period 73
- The chart below shows the number of the Internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013 82
- The graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four different countries in 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55462184874 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42136408356 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512605042017 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.0414679388 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.857142857 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325249825506 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138626907694 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104544054305 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195078199587 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109801494706 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.