Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or ex

With the demands for historical and art interests, some museums and galleries implement admittance fees, meanwhile, others also maintain free entrance for visitors. In my opinion, I do agree that the advantage of admission fees could compass its drawbacks for some reasons.

On the one hand, free charging for entering a museum or art exhibition would increase the number of visitors and therefore evaluate the public engagement in historical theory and artistic beauty. According to this statement, anyone regardless of their financial ability can observe and savour artefacts related to the humans' revolution, civilization. As a result, the general knowledge of history in a nation or a region could be expanded.

However, it is claimed that there are admission fees at different extents charged by some museums and art exhibitions. In facts, these fees are essential for launching the operations in these destinations. Firstly, the fees are utilized to pay a large amount of salary for the workforce who are responsible for the security and cleanliness of museums and galleries. Secondly, some artefacts need special preservation methods which costs a considerable sum of money that should be paid by the visitors. For example, an adequate cooling condition is a demand for maintaining the beauty and quality of a lacquer painting.

In conclusion, there are some inevitable consequences of entrance fees charged by some museums and art exhibitions. However, I strongly believe that these fee levels will convince their benefits in keeping the workforce suitable incomes and the masterpiece well-maintained and original.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...rve and savour artefacts related to the humans revolution, civilization. As a result, ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50199203187 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0547612289 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605577689243 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8887012007 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.083333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300825073049 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107883459456 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777424858048 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179591550498 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710571060998 0.056905535591 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.