Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
By and large, the ways governments should allocate and spend their budget has always been a decisive factor in pushing society forward and guarantee prosperity for people. In this regard, one crucial question that is a place of contradiction is whether governments should reduce the budget they spend on athletics and use it to support the arts. I think governments should use more financial resources on art compared to other areas like athletic activities. In what follows, I will elaborate on two reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Firstly, I contend that the majority of people can benefit from artistic activities when governments put their effort and budget into promoting arts in society. In other words, from making art to showing art in museums and exhibitions, both artists and ordinary people can enjoy these creations. As a result, when governments support artists financially, those artists who spend their immense asset of skills and time creating pieces of music or drawing astonishing paintings can deliver artworks that are richer in quality. Adding to that, people who attend concerts or visit art galleries can have a more exciting experience, spending time on more valuable art pieces. In contrast, although spending more money on athletics can bring prosperity for them, fewer people can benefit from their success. For instance, when an athlete wins a medal in an Olympics, although he makes sense of pride for his people, it's a temporary feeling. It is not as consistent as adding to the heritage of one nation's culture with unforgettable arts.
Secondly, my conviction is that arts are one of the most significant factors that can determine the prosperity of a nation. Also, it is a considerable way to have a positive impression on people and make cultural changes in society. To be more specific, when governments pay more attention to their artists, more and more people are encouraged to participate in these kinds of activities. It goes without saying that when people are more concerned about topics like art, the country can move toward a nourishing culture that can bring other advances. For example, one can consider the case of the Renaissance, when artists took the lead with their cultural revolution and promoted important concepts through their artwork. Through the effortless activities of artists at that time, people were attracted to arts and culture, which helped them broaden their viewpoint and make fruitful changes in their lives. By increasing people's awareness, they managed to bring prosperity to their societies. Had they not had talented artists, they could not make long-lasting cultural shifts that brought success for them.
According to the reasons mentioned above, it is a foregone conclusion that the arts have an essential effect on society. Artwork can be considered as a way to convey thoughtful ideas. So, governments should prioritize artists and spend more money on facilitating their activities since the community can be deeply affected by artists and their works.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
- salinity in a lake 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 73
- Rhinoceros 3
- Plain of jars TPO 59 83
- 65 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To solve present and future problems it is necessary to understand the past 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 911, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...he makes sense of pride for his people, its a temporary feeling. It is not as consi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, as a result, by and large, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2561.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25872689938 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80811463485 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509240246407 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2977676669 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.409090909 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1363636364 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173836752981 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570941050664 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522876554621 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128561687108 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500658654485 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.