The given line graph delineates the data regarding the changes in various regions of crime, Burglary, Car theft and Robbery over a decade.
Overall, it can be seen that, the highest change was seen in the burglary area whereas, other two regions Car theft and robbery was also showing fluctuations.
It is crystal clear that, in 2003, near about 510 robbery was done which was increase and reached approximately 900. However, between 2005 and 2009, the crime of robbery declined slightly. While, in 2009 it was also gone up and after that in 2010 it was showing downward trend and reached where it start in 2003.
Moving further, the crime of car theft was begun at around 2025 in 2003 which was decrease and accounted at 2000 in 2006. Meanwhile, from 2006 to 2012, the crime in car theft was fluctuated and reached near about 2575. On the contrary, in 2003 crime of burglary was start at around 3500 and comprised 3575 in 2004. A dramatic declined was observed in the crime of burglary between 2004 and 2008. After 2008 it was showing upward trend and reached about 1450 in 2012.
- The chart below shows the number and the purpose of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 73
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 73
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 77
- Music is played in every society and culture in the world today Some people think that music brings only benefits to individuals and societies Others however think that music can have a negative influence on both Discuss both views and give your own opini
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, so, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70680628272 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28332284723 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534031413613 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8452868543 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150588950215 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723387598768 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255857670052 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928693673433 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257742271474 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.