The information about the total number of minutes spent on telephone calls in the United Kingdom between 1995 and 2002 is depicted by the rendered bar chart. The data has been calibrated in billions.
To begin with, 70 billion minutes spent on telephone calls by Local line. However, there was a gradual increase seen in the number of minutes on calls by local line until 1999, it accounted for 88. In 1995, the number of minutes spent on calls by the National and Internation line was 38 billion. Furthermore, after 4 years, it was increased by 11. Only 2 billion minutes were spent on calls by Mobiles in 1995. Moreover, a drastic increase was noticed in the total number of minutes until 1999, which was increased by 10.
Moving towards, from 1999 to 2002, there had been dramatic decrease observed in the number of minutes spent on Local call. In addition, the minutes were spent on calls by National and Internation and Mobiles between 1999 to 2002 were increased rapidly, it comprised for 55 billion and 45 billion respectively.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the most popular category for call in the UK was Local fixed-line throughout the span.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of the telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79802955665 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54725058151 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502463054187 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1834449454 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5454545455 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327930405185 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141614439461 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907885172597 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202048952402 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656397963618 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.