It is inevitable fact that some individuals have the quality of leadership from their birth however some people assert that a person can learn any leader quality skills in his life. In this essay, I will explicate both the sides.
To commence with, most of the time, people are born with their natural qualities like cricketer, singer, and artist because of their parent's genes and some grown up with leadership qualities because of their political background. They can lead anyway and go with the team in distinctive ways. For example, in India, most of the politician chooses the politics due to fact that they can handle and lead their party from the front.
On the antithesis side, most of people have no leadership quality from their birth but they can learn that thing from the other sources, which are available like the institute of markets. Nowadays, people can go and find the institute and join it to learn the qualities of leadership. For instance, recently in Newyork, a person who had no leadership background, nowis handling the cricket team of their nation and the team performed well in his establishment.
In compendium, after ruminating a great deal of thoughts and deliberation, I come to the conclusion that despite a person has no leadership quality but he can change himself by following the rules and by training from their mentt.
- Crimes and other kinds of information on TV and newspapers have bad consequences This kind of information should be restricted to be shown in media To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 11
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 56
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... the front. On the antithesis side, most of people have no leadership quality from their b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96506550218 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65307472846 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532751091703 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1660654132 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215170241799 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996064028412 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838786911612 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144093125295 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846680048589 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.