The line graph compares the percentages of age group which join in cinema including aged14-24, aged 24-34, aged 34-44 and aged 44-54 in the UK over a 20-year period between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there was the upwards trend in all 4 group over the period shown. Another interesting point is that the number of people who in the age of 44-55 enjoy attending on cinema always the highest in the graph, while age of 14-24 witnessed a lowest figure.
Looking at the details, from 1990 there were a fluctuations in 10 years of age 44-54 approximate 38% in 2000. Following that the figure experienced a rapid increased to roughly 47% in 2005 and it continued to climb to reached the peaked at over 50% in 2010. Although similar trend with aged 44-54, the percentages of aged 14-24 always the lowest percent. Starting with 15% in 1990 and saw a fluctuations. Nevertheless in 2000 the percent increased gradually and expected to over 20%.
By contrast, both the age from 24 to 34 and age from 34-44 witnessed the same trend when they were went up from 1990 to 1995 with the percentage were 28% and 38%. After that they dropped in 5 years to 2000 but aged 24-34 rose significantly in next 5 years with 34% in 2005 and unchanged from 2005 to 2010. While the percentages of age 34-44 went up in the next 10 years and expected to 45% in 2010.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: syahid prabowo
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...the graph, while age of 14-24 witnessed a lowest figure. Looking at the details,...
^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a fluctuation' or simply 'fluctuations'?
Suggestion: a fluctuation; fluctuations
...cent. Starting with 15% in 1990 and saw a fluctuations. Nevertheless in 2000 the percent incre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ith 15% in 1990 and saw a fluctuations. Nevertheless in 2000 the percent increased gradually...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, nevertheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49402390438 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46426500649 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494023904382 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2532702045 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.545454545 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0410046116682 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0170049088149 0.103423049105 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298281899234 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0393135058755 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039380220053 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.