In the future, transportation will be autonomous and travel without drivers. While this trend brings several benefits and drawbacks should not be ignored. I firmly believe that the benefits this trend brings exceed its drawbacks.
On the one hand, automated vehicles could increase security problems. To be more specific, autonomous vehicles could be the next major target of the hackers as this vehicles contain the data and details of the owner. For example, as autonomous transportation is a giant moving computers, hackers can access to these vehicles and steal our personal information. As a result, our data could be leaked or sold on the internet publicly.
However, I believe the negative aspects of this trend are eclipsed by positive benefits. On the other hand, driverless vehicles could decrease the number of transportation accidents. In more detail, autonomous vehicles are designed to prevent human errors through the system control the vehicles and it cannot be distracted by disruptions. Consequently, it would lessen the chances of accidents dramatically. Moreover, traffic jams would be diminished effectively by driverless cars. In other words, all autonomous cars run on one automated traffic and cars would be monitored effectively at optimized distances. A recent study by Google shows that an automated system would reduce traffic congestions significantly by 75% through monitoring and supervising cars on the road. Therefore, this may decline traffic congestions and the traffic could become efficient.
In conclusion, the merits of this trend are clearly more significant. transportation accidents may not only be reduced but also traffic jams would be declined considerably. Furthermore, driverless vehicles can be reinforced in system, which curbs hackers from hacking into the systems, by manufacturers.
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 73
- As countries develop people tend to buy more and more cars Do you thing the advantages for the individual outweigh the disadvantages for the environment 78
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are reasons for these behaviors What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 84
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people prefer to have temporary jobs which means they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of the time to do what they want What is your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...the next major target of the hackers as this vehicles contain the data and details o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'computer'?
Suggestion: computer
...nomous transportation is a giant moving computers, hackers can access to these vehicles a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Transportation
...his trend are clearly more significant. transportation accidents may not only be reduced but a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6678700361 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11157829451 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548736462094 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6850382958 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2222222222 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3888888889 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255496544044 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810692734413 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065580853758 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157164938379 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261563297271 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.