In contemporary era, for minority of individuals purchasing is not just about buying what is crucial, but it is a form of treat . I believe that this is a costructive occurrence due to waste of money or time and just for a high status.
To commence with, there are multifarious reasons but vital reason is a, they just waste of their money or time. To elaborate it, when they go to mall for buy things, they are not recognize that this is a essential or not for them. They are fully foolnesh because they waste their money or precious time. To epitome, a survey was conducted by the japan university that 22% masses in 2019 , they are misuse their 80% money from their wages, at the same time they waste their valuable time. Hence, with this persons lose their reputation front of their family.
Furtermore, in addition they are doing just because of their high status. To explicate it, when they seeing other people, they buying waste things just for show off to other pupils. Only with this they ponder that they big hearted from them. For instance, a headline was published by " THE MOSCOW TIMES " newspaper revealed that in 2017 in megha mall france, one is human spend two lakh money on shopping and buying wasting things, just or show off and show off their level. As a result, with this pretense humans are engaged in ruining themselves.
To conclude, they are shopping just for their entertainment, they wil be lot of waste their time or money and they will show off their level to others individuals, with this they destroy themselves.
- The best way to understand other cultures is to work for a multinational organisation To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- For some people shopping is not just about buying what is necessary but a form of entertainment Do you think it is a positive or a negative development Give your opinion and examples from your experience 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...at is crucial, but it is a form of treat . I believe that this is a costructive oc...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'a'?
...ultifarious reasons but vital reason is a, they just waste of their money or time....
^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'recognized'.
Suggestion: recognized
...go to mall for buy things, they are not recognize that this is a essential or not for the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...gs, they are not recognize that this is a essential or not for them. They are ful...
^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...japan university that 22% masses in 2019 , they are misuse their 80% money from th...
^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... waste their valuable time. Hence, with this persons lose their reputation front of ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41110374348 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509090909091 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4250203513 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0982381671832 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511596063523 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510415399846 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887702345706 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547762269395 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.