Globalization has had many pros and cons since the 1950s which this phenomenon has appeared in the world. Since then many rich countries have opened their doors to more talented people, especially those who have academic degrees and can fill vacancies in some high-tech positions like engineering, computing, or even medicine. Many believe that this can cause serious problems for poor countries as they export their brains unintentionally and due to the tempting offers by developed countries, however, there is another group of people who think it is a natural movement of workers throughout the world and there is no reason to be concern about. In this essay, we will examine different aspects of such a phenomenon and support the idea with real examples.
In my opinion, it is a reality that these kinds of immigrations can cause a severe shortage of experts and specialized labor force in under developing countries. However, we must not forget that many people who are seeking new positions in other countries, do not imagine any future for themselves inside of their own origin countries. Therefore, we cannot agree or disagree with a phenomenon that is the result of some other issues.
In today's world by existing social media people can see facilities and the standard of living in other places of the world. Therefore, those who are living in less developed countries always try to select the fastest and easiest way for reaching those facilities or lifestyles. However, it is not always the cheapest way, and sometimes people who travel illegally and try to achieve their dreamlands as refugees will die in their path due to perilous voyages.
In fact, instead of blaming the people who are trying to find a better life in developed countries like European or North American countries, we have to focus on real reasons that cause undeveloped situations for some parts of the world.
It seems exploitation has not yet been disappeared from the world and still some countries try to absorb resources of poorer countries, pay less for what they extract and export from those countries, and finally get back even those small fees that they paid by selling new expensive products to those regions. Therefore, at the end not only rich countries do not pay a fair price for what they steal, they sometimes support civil wars and leave the poorer nations alone in their undeveloped situations.
Therefore, people and especially those who have some sort of knowledge or skills try to survive themselves and their families by immigration. This will affect the poor countries as they will lose their human resources, however, if you cannot pay your labor forces adequately someone else can pay. People are looking for safety, democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of beliefs, and of course suitable income. Thus, if one of these five main concerns does not fulfill then people start to flee the situation. However, we must add a shortage of food and water to this list too because of serious shortages that are going to be common nowadays because of global warming.
To sum up, immigration due to finding and forming a better standard in life is not a bad thing but its own, however, it is obvious that poor countries will face negative consequences of such movement sooner or late. Therefore, we should provide stable development for all parts of the world to help people make their dreams in their homeland.
- Some people claim that family members are more important than friends Do you agree or disagree 73
- A country s future depends on its young people Therefore it is argued that the government should invest heavily in its youth Do you agree or disagree 73
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering computing and medicine Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor 73
- In many countries the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing Why is this happening What will be the effects of it on the family and society 56
- The bar chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, so, still, then, therefore, thus, in fact, of course, sort of, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 10.4138276553 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 55.0 24.0651302605 229% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2847.0 1615.20841683 176% => OK
No of words: 572.0 315.596192385 181% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97727272727 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62642752542 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 176.041082164 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498251748252 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 880.2 506.74238477 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.8449480865 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.35 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213733212889 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613835632998 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415533107713 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10678236957 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384181772002 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.