The charts below show the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much in the USA
The pie charts highlight data about the medium proportion of different sorts of nutrients consumed at the typical meals, namely breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks of the population in the USA, which is not good for their own health if they eat in a massive quantity.
Overall, what stands out from the charts is that dinner holds the lion share among those supplements, except added sugar. Another interesting point is that breakfast has registered the lowest figure compared to the remaining meals.
Looking at the details, as regards sodium, the amount of it on average accounted for 14% of total one consumed at snacks, which was about three times as low as that of sodium at dinner, at 43%. Nevertheless, it could be easily seen that there was an contrast distribution of the percentage of added sugar. It averaged at 23% at dinner and at 42% at snacks. In addition, the proportion of these nutrients, sodium and added sugar, shared the nearly similar figure, at 14% and 16% in turn at breakfast, 29% and 19% respectively at lunch.
There was an even distribution of saturated fat among breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks, at 16%, 26%, 37% and 21% in turn.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-10 | Phương Nga | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much in the USA 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantage of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 84
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socailizing on social networks or banking purpose Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... it could be easily seen that there was an contrast distribution of the percentage...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, nevertheless, so, as regards, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64196896272 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9455405982 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0808236411136 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378470467483 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391783406544 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483360270084 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04371219634 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.