With the aid of modern transportation and technology, researchers and travellers these days could explore the beauty of some natural environment landscapes despite distances. Travelling to such destinations have both positive and negative impacts on the environment as well as the indigenous people. Personally, I believe that the advantages of these explorations are mostly eclipsed by their drawbacks.
On the positive side, the possibility to reach new and remote destinations bring considerable benefits to different scientific fields as well as the tourist industry. Firstly, it might have an essential impact on clinical breakthroughs as a new swath means new herbs and extraordinary meditation. Secondly, the more places are explored, the more comprehensive the geographic field becomes. Another advantage is for tourists to take adventures and enjoy the gorgeous scenery of such an untouched landscape. Accordingly, travel enthusiasts are always on the lookout for new exotic getaways such as the South pole as an effective remedy for fatigue and long, stressful working hours.
On the other hand, the downside of this trend is prone to outweigh its disadvantages because of more threats to life in this natural world. More often than not, as more and more corporations are in the race of tourism evolution that make lucrative benefits, therefore, the managers will immediately exploit various kind of facilities in these remove places for travellers to enjoy. These constructions drive out the natives, coerce them to assimilation and at the same time pose an alarming threat to the local environment namely water, air pollution, deforestation, soil erosion, etc.
In conclusion, although it is fantastic and full of excitement exploring entirely new natural areas, I believe that these landscapes are better off left unreached.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both view and give your own opi 11
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people Discuss the advantages and disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo 73
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ution, deforestation, soil erosion, etc. In conclusion, although it is fantastic ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55160142349 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15099988794 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633451957295 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4918834098 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247253392465 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782545910929 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611220134074 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11773325387 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560447570284 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.