Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless they in fact prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals

Although luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are more attractive, it is only through facing harsh realities of life that truly strong and independent individuals develop. History has been witness to the cliché presented here, no matter what time it is the thought has always held true. To begin with, when one elopes with luxuries of life he becomes weak and confined to his luxuries but when he breakthroughs those same limits to face the harsh realities of the world and grow by facing our fears.

When one delves in the luxuries and conveniences presented with little to no regard to facing realities. Definitely, his fall is certain and not only he loose opportunities he had but also the luxuries for which he ignored his opportunities. Unambiguously the more one becomes accustomed with luxuries the more he becomes ignorant to the real world. Additionally, a sybarite builds a comfort zone for himself within his luxuries and further restricts his own development and growth which later proves to be very difficult to break out of for the individual. Mero was a chieftain in feudal era Asia he was known for his luxuries all over Asia, once his palace was attacked the poor Mero refused to fight due to lack of this feather slippers and as a result got slayed for his desire for luxury even when facing death.

Contrastingly, when one faces realities and comes to terms with his fears the individual experiences growth. Not only his strength and thinking ability expand from previous levels but he also gets accustomed to new principles to follow in life. Even though, one may fail while facing his fears the experience he gains is valuable as it helps him guide against his fears next time. King Denel attacked Suriname 17 times each was defeated, either by strategy, luck or sheer numbers however he won the 18th time had he not faced his fears and fought again and again for Suriname no-one would have known him. Hence, a man must face his fears and give no regard to luxuries and conveniences of life.

Furthermore, in the field of psychiatry there is a phenomenon of "pervication" where when an individual decides to push against his set limits of mind he experiences a remarkable expansion of brain in thinking capabilities and will power to do work. Therefore, the person is no longer bound to his comforts, is now free to control his body and mind, and truly becomes free from his servitude to luxuries. Such freedom is what should one aspire for rather than to fantasize of comforts.

We can finally deduce that it is better to face your realities rather than to be slave to luxuries. Even if, they appear more inviting than others one should never forget that such a path always leads to misery. Rather, a path with realities of this world frees our mind and elevates our spirit, develops us better versions of ourselves that we aspire to be, and new higher limits are set for us.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experiences'' or 'experience's'?
Suggestion: experiences'; experience's
... to terms with his fears the individual experiences growth. Not only his strength and think...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and new higher limits are set for us.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82142857143 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73239572437 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519841269841 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4060308527 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.894736842 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5263157895 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116772000688 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048961943096 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077414176839 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762498017852 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592027752932 0.0667264976115 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.