Today single use products are still very common What are the problems associated with this What are some possible solutions

Increasing consumption of single time use products creates a negative impact on the environment. Government should make strict law against the use of hazardous products, which has detrimental effects on the Earth. This essay shall discuss the causes behind this phenomenon and suggeste preferable solutions.

To commence with, a predominant reason behind this behind this situation is increment in use of plastic. Plastics have a disadvantageous effects on the Planet as it creates plenty of pollution in the air and, it is very lengthy process to destroy the wastage of plastics. Moreover, single time use plastic material consume at higher level by people, which produce more wastage materials. Furthermore, a study also proved that use of plastic has detrimental effect on human's health. To epitome, people who consume hot meals in a plastic packing material, cause disease such as cencer.

On the other hand, people can use cotton bags which has no negative impact on the environment and much more durable compared with plastic. Furthermore, masses can use of recycle products such as metal, glass and mixed paper. What is more, people can follow the law which is made by the government and, it should be implement well. Citizens who disobey the law must be penalised highly so that they can understand the value of the environment. Besides, law-enforcement agency should apply heavy taxes on the use of plastic, so that less people would prefer to use this source.

To close the discussion, single time use products have negative impact on the environment, government should encourage to the people to use recycle material which is eco-friendly.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'behind this'.
Suggestion: behind this
... To commence with, a predominant reason behind this behind this situation is increment in use of plasti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...lastic. Plastics have a disadvantageous effects on the Planet as it creates plenty of p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...se of plastic has detrimental effect on humans health. To epitome, people who consume ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'implemented'?
Suggestion: implemented
...ade by the government and, it should be implement well. Citizens who disobey the law must...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...vy taxes on the use of plastic, so that less people would prefer to use this source....
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, moreover, so, well, such as, what is more, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24060150376 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82964608063 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541353383459 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9083857652 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.5714285714 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177874105594 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653196270201 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411856218256 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116453588619 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00965577934097 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.