The charts below show the percentages of male and female students getting top
grades in 1960 and 2000. summarise the information by selecting ,nd ."po"ting
the main features and make comparisons where relevant,
The bar charts illustrate the ratio of men and women pupils achieving top grades in different subjects: science, arts, maths, language and humanities in the year 1960 and 2000. The X and Y-axis represent different groups in subject and grades ratio, respectively.
Overall, it is apparent from the bar charts that boys scored better than girls in humanities in 2000; in contradictory side, girls scored better than boys in language in the year 1960. With regards to proportion of male student, in 1960, almost 35 percentage scored achive in science. According to maths show 30per. . Rate of language was almost same for both the year, which was approximately 20 percentage. Ratio of humanities was approximate 20percentage. In 1960 and well grow and reached peack point 45perceentage in the year 2000. In 2000, percentage of science and maths were similar which was 19percentage.
Furthermore, as per the proportion of female learners, science and maths ratio were similar to both of year, which was 10percentage and 5percentage, individually. In 1960, pupils ratio was high than in the 2000 learners for language, humanities and arts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-19 | Timbadiya ashmita | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the percentages of male and female students getting top grades in 1960 and 2000 summarise the information by selecting nd po ting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show the percentages of male and female students getting top grades in 1960 and 2000 75
- Despite of large number of gyms sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What are the problems associated with it What solutions can you suggest 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e student, in 1960, almost 35 percentage scored achive in science. According to m...
^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...science. According to maths show 30per. . Rate of language was almost same for bo...
^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...60 and well grow and reached peack point 45perceentage in the year 2000. In 2000,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26923076923 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96142599013 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543956043956 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1653488147 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1818181818 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5454545455 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143501105642 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597087052478 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427166485849 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099733915305 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302440671994 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.