Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is this a positive or a negative development?
It is hard to overstate the great importance of natural resources, especially fossil fuels, to human beings’ life. For centuries, they have been the sole source of energy to provide us with necessities in our daily activities. However, this is no longer the case as renewable resources are being introduced in a myriad of countries. This essay will look at both drawbacks of this trend, before pointing out how the disadvantages pale in comparisons with the advantages.
On the one hand, opponents of alternative sources of energy have compelling reasons for their disapproval. First and foremost, the cost of alternative sources of energy is exorbitant. As a result, the use of them may be limited to developed and rich countries, where a colossal amount of money from the government budget can be allocated to these resources. Additionally, power generated from renewable source is considered to be reliable. This situation manifests itself starkly in the case of wind power plants and windmills, which can only be erected in windy places such as coastal areas, etc., thus generating inadequate amount of electricity for daily uses. Therefore, alternative resources are not an effective replacement of conventional energy source.
Nevetheless, from my perspective, this is an extremely positive innovation in the energy industry. Compared to traditional energy sources, renewable ones are much more abundant and seemingly endless, which enables humankind to use them without the fear of running out as in the case of fossil fuels, which are becoming more and more precious these days. More importantly, sustainable energy resources are more environmentally friendly. For decades, the combustion of fossil fuels has been the primary culprit behind a mountain of carbon footprint, which could have dire repercussion for global warming and ice melting, threatening the survival of human race and wildlife species alike. Meanwhile, carbon- free energy can be a viable solution to this problem due to its feature of leaving no harmful effects on the environment. For the aforementioned reasons, it is suggested that these sources of energy should be harnessed in the interests of human beings.
In conclusion, notwithstanding some shortcomings of the new trend in the field of energy, I strongly advocate the use of alternative sources for the sustainability and prosperity of our planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-19 | Cynthia Nguyen | 84 | view |
- Computers are now the basis of the modern world They should therefore be introduced into classrooms and their programs used for direct teaching purposes However dependence on computers in teaching may carry a certain degree of risk to students Discuss bot 84
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Please comment my essay Thank you Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individual and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that for school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than parents Others argue that parents are not less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41443850267 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12136087402 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577540106952 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.530850199 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.117647059 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310369451953 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103486852828 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660237107339 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181468686685 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037749932372 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.