It is true that animal testing nowadays becomes common in developing new medical products. While there are some strong arguments for doing experiments on animals, I still believe that these actions should be strictly prohibited.
There are several reasons why people might argue that it is necessary to implement experiments on animals. Firstly, animals are used in important scientific research. Many pieces of research not only lead to finding out good medicine for humans but they also help to advance scientific knowledge and medical breakthrough. Secondly, researchers aim to minimize the suffering that animals experience. Most of the scientists do research without harm and try to find good treatments for the animals so that animals rights have not made big claims against the research while always claim about killing and hunting animals. Finally, some medical or scientific experiments simply cannot be done on humans.
On the one hand, there are several drawbacks of animals testing that should not be underestimated. One major reason is that the animals are important parts of the earth so their lives should be respected. While people respect each other, this is same as the relation between humans and animals. Furthermore, the benefits of research using animals do not justify the suffering caused. In fact, if one of the tests failed the guilty conscience would affect those people who have done such experiments. Besides, there are alternative methods of research. Computer simulation can be used in most cases, for example.
In conclusion, both advantages and disadvantages should be taken into account when judge such a controversial issue, personally, according to the reasons above it seems that the drawbacks that both humans and animals can reap from animal testing research outweigh the benefits that it has.
- The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 61
- The maps below changes in the Spanish city of Castellon in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparations where relevant 59
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 11
- The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in most cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75160269538 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57785467128 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.447161844 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6875 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313651864809 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105616422857 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560005654792 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196982513267 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565691192339 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.