The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table illustrates the percentage of the consumption of five types of items in five European countries in the year 2002.
It is noticeable that the largest proportion of customer spending in each country went on food, drinks, and tobacco. Meanwhile, leisure and education experienced the lowest level of customer expenditure from all five countries in 2002.
In 2002, Turkey was a country where had the highest percentage of consumer expenditure for food, drinks, and tobacco, at 32.14%. This figure was twofold higher than those shown in Italy, with an estimated 16.36%. The lowest rate of consumer spending was belonged to Sweden, at nearly 16%.
In terms of clothing and footwear consumption rate, Italy experienced the largest percentage of consumer expenditure, at approximately 9%, compared to that figure for Sweden which reached the lowest proportion, at roughly 5.4%. Also, three of the remaining countries shown the same level of customer spending on clothing and footwear, at more than 6% in 2002.
Regarding leisure and education, consumers in Turkey spent approximately 4.4% on these items whereas Spanish people tended to spend the least of their expenditure on leisure and education, which just reached an estimated of nearly 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 73
- The diagrams illustrate the stages in the life of a silkworm and the process of producing silk cloth 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3654822335 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8378222415 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53807106599 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1073917805 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.444444444 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220258493616 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102909431504 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744430829384 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140220171789 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746618045562 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.