The bar chart depicts what youngsters spent several hours per week doing in Chester between 2002 and 2007.
Overall, throughout the time period, the ubiquity of watching TV has gained a substantial increase and was the most time-taking activity among teenagers with the average time spent crossing the 25-hours mark. On the other hand, not many young people spent time playing bowling, of which the aggregate hour counted on a weekly scale remained just under 5 hours.
As per the chart, in the first three years of the time period, the trend of going to pubs or discos, watching TV and DVDs share some similarities with an overall increase. Doing homework and sport, however, saw a different pattern during the aforementioned time range: the former stagnated at somewhere in the vicinity of 12% in 2003 and 2004, whereas the latter witness a gradual 1% fall throughout the years.
From 2005 to 2007, noticeably, shopping time rise to merely 13% in 2005 before it reached a plateau of 15% in the next two years. In addition, time spent on doing homework decrease but was not as significant as that of doing sports which hit a trough of less than 5% in 2007, and watching DVDs with more than 15% and 10% in 2005 and 2007, respectively. Last but not least, youngsters spent nearly double the time going to the discos in 2007 than they did in the previous years.
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits Write a report for a university lecturer the process below 61
- The diagram shows the process of growing bananas for selling in supermarkets 78
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 87
- Many parents today organize extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school 78
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...07 than they did in the previous years.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, whereas, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76050420168 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47662969665 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596638655462 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1138197832 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.625 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226019661665 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107364864082 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124486097534 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172239942535 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150633540536 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.