We are living in the cultural traditional country some believes that cultural traditions may get knockdown when they are used as money earning point from travellers. Whereas, another group of thinker supports that it is just action to rescue these traditions. However, both has its own pros and cons, therefore, before commenting on my decision both the views are discussed in the ensuring paragraph.
Examining the former opinion the primary argument the supports would put forward is government's money earning point from travellers. This is because our tradition learn lots of truth about our cultural stereotypes to every people. Furthermore, every country is famoused for their own diverse features for their cultural wealth and unbreakable traditions. Moreover, cultural tradition should be free of visited for the all group of people and also for tourism, in order to people know about our country and culture. In addition, cultural architecture should be with less fees for all people.it should not be used as money making aimed. For instance, in our guitar state there are one biggest cultural tradition in kutch city that at the time of "runn utsav", around the all neighbouring country's people comes and participate there with their own kites into kites festival. It is fact example of our county's wealth, culture and traditions.
On the contrary, the letter view suggest that way to save these traditions because government takes charge like entry fees for ancient and cultural architecture during visited and I think it should be reasonable for local travellers. Besides, it is natural facts because of that money government could also use for cleaned cultural architecture and well redeveloping them. For instance, nowadays India's biggest cultural architecture tajmahal is being cleaned using a mud called " fullers earth" and also being re-developing. After this process it will be opened for all tourist to visit. Besides this, government should make a various laws for the conservation of our cultural architecture. In fact, government bodies should take strictly decision while, comes against fraud cases of cultural construction. For instance, in our India some temple's fake priests, pundits and sadhus, who welcome you, take you around the temple and after this they demand a donation between 200 to 1000 rupees. On this, government could takes decision on receipts that is gives by religion institution for every donation made.
To conclude and give my opinion I would say that government should takes appropriate reasonable fees for all tourist to visit and should make strict rules against frauders is the most ideal appropriate way to deal with this situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as money earning point from travellers. Whereas, another group of thinker supports that...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun fees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...n, cultural architecture should be with less fees for all people.it should not be us...
^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Indias the biggest'.
Suggestion: Indias the biggest
...developing them. For instance, nowadays Indias biggest cultural architecture tajmahal is being...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'law'?
Suggestion: law
... this, government should make a various laws for the conservation of our cultural ar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1028, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'take'
Suggestion: take
... 1000 rupees. On this, government could takes decision on receipts that is gives by r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2289.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37323943662 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75682913892 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528169014085 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9263275257 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.473684211 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4210526316 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84210526316 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237672643063 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780553260077 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606907651363 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157796193946 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596395390282 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.