The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie charts illustrate the prevalence of a range of methods by which people can keep themselves well-informed in Canada and Australia
Overall, the main ways of staying up-to-date in those aforementioned countries are by going online and watching TV.Also, the two nations show broadly similar patterns though there are some differences, both significant and minor
As per the chart, a prominet number of Australians read articles on the Internet, and this crosses the halfway mark with 52%, while this figure in Canada is relatively lower with 36%. Moreover, the most popular way of obtaining news in Canada is from Tv, which almost equalizes those who get them from online sources, with each category accounting for 40% and 36%, respectively. On the other hand, the percentage of people reading online news in Australians is 15% more pervasive than getting hold of information through TV
It is apparent that Australia witnessed the same proportion of people listening to radio news and those who get day-to-day information through unspecified sources, with just under 5%. In addition, the share of people reading prints in Canada doubles that of australia with 14%. Finally, although listening to the radio in Canada is more widely known than that in Australia, this share only takes up approximately one-tenth of the overall proportion within the nation
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-08 | tr_h.20 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | RIYA MODI | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | baotrammm | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | kien150199 | view | |
| 2023-07-15 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the stages and equiment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 73
- The chart shows the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people suggest that social networking and online communication have increased social isolation In what ways do you think this has happened Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at 61
Comments
Sorry but I think you copied…
sorry but I think copied the wrong word "a prominet number", it should be 'prominent'.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...ies are by going online and watching TV.Also, the two nations show broadly similar p...
^^^^
Line 7, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the overall proportion within the nation
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28899082569 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83327722078 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614678899083 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 160.4685639 43.030603864 373% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 230.6 112.824112599 204% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.6 22.9334400587 190% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.2 5.23603664747 290% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171364667122 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089497832725 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322307959304 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108709577425 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474119865761 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.3 13.2329268293 191% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 61.2550243902 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 10.3012195122 195% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.29 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.4329268293 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 28.0 11.0658536585 253% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.