Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things related to schoolwork

Essay topics:

Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things related to schoolwork.

Without any shadow of doubt, family is a pivotal component of the society, and parents’ role is significantly important in children’s lives. As far as I am concerned, it is vital for parents to allocate adequate time to play with their children. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
To start with, doing recreational activities have positive impact on children’s self-confidence. Many researches demonstrate that there are solid relationships between fun physical activities and self-confidence. When parents consider a free time for having fun with their children by engaging them in games or sports, it consolidates the sense of belonging and being important in youngsters. They recognize that however their parents are busy; they still can make some time for the children. It positively affects their personality, and consequently, they will be more confident in their adulthood.
Furthermore, having fun through spending time on playing sports and games, leads children to push back the frontiers of their interpersonal skills. Generally, busy parents are out of the house, and their children are alone in home. As a result, they do not develop well-established social skills, and will face challenges when they are grownups. There are many physical activities, which could happen in a social context. For instance, playhouses are places in which parents and children could spend time together, while meeting other families. This would help children to learn how to react in social situation, and how make new friends. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a little girl, we used to go to a park with wonderful playhouse with my family, so my brother and I could have fun with our parents, as well as finding other kids to play with them. At first, it was devastating for me to start a conversation with other children. However, by my mother’s encouragement, I took some steps and enjoyed playing with others.
In conclusion, I am of the view that parents who have a hectic life should have in mind to consider specific time for their children doing activities such as sports and games. This is because it helps their children to have higher self-confidence, and gives them the opportunity to enhance their social skills. Children are the gift of life, we should be sensitive how we are treating them.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-30 YasamanEsml 73 view
2023-04-10 wyc 70 view
2023-04-10 wyc 70 view
2023-04-10 KimiaKermanshahian 73 view
2023-03-25 sonyeoso 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Mahimoon :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10969387755 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04048994105 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1416964491 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.380952381 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38095238095 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352986596107 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101986122501 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084095459642 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218642513483 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589038989807 0.0645574589148 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10969387755 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04048994105 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1416964491 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.380952381 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38095238095 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352986596107 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101986122501 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084095459642 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218642513483 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589038989807 0.0645574589148 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.