The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
The problem of waste generation among the households of various countries is an increasing one. The myriad of waste produced by the households is proving to be a uge problem for the environment. Adding to the problems, majority of the waste products generated are non-degradable which means that the recycling process of such products is a tedious one. All these problems leads towards a single viable solution of controlling the amount of waste accepted from a particular household. In the following ways, this action will lead towards the desirable consquences.
Imposing a limit of acceptance of trash will certainly motivate the residents to try to produce a reduced amount of trash. There are various waste management techniques through which the amount of waste generated can be reduced to a great extent. The public will look into such techniques more often as a restriction on the amount of trash accepted has been imposed. This in all, will lead towards lesser waste generation which is certainly beneficial for the environment.
A case analogous to the situation in picture is that of the Carbon Footprint Policy. According to it, all the participant countries who report that they manage to reduce the Carbon Footprint produced by them will be incetivized. These incentives include favourable policies, gargantuan monetary incentives etc. This in a way, promotes the reduction of Carbon Footprint. This leads towards an ameliorated milieu for the citizens of the country to live in as the Carbon Footprint produced is quite virulent for the environment and has already hurled a superluous amount of damage towards it.
If the above stated policy is implemented, the residents will certainly face certain inconveniences. If a certain household has produced excess amount of waste due to some unavoidable circumstances, that extra waste would remain stagnant at their place and harm the aesthetics. This may lead the people to indulge into some illicit activities like illegal waste dumping, surrepticiously dumping their waste into the waste bins of their neighbors or other people, a few to list down. These activities are in no ways avoidable but can be easily tracked down and the appropriate actions may be carried out. All of this in a way inculcates a feeling of realiasation into the minds of the residents. They realise the damage such waste products do to the environment they live in. And at the end of the day, all the efforts done by the authoritis would yield a successfull outcome because the primary motive of these authorities is to evoke a sense of responsibility.
To recapitulate all the concepts stated above, the decision to regulate the amount of waste accepted from the households would lead to an reduction in of malinger of the public towards waste management and would certainly obviate the problems caused by the prodigal elements of tehe society. The people would realize and appreciate the importance of the environment and try to adapt to new techniques which in all, leads towards lesser waste disposal and the achievement of a desirable environment to live in.
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 90
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that numbe 69
- In any field of endeavour it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 70
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 54
- In any field of endeavour it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 58
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...various countries is an increasing one. The myriad of waste produced by the househo...
^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...uced by the households is proving to be a uge problem for the environment. Adding...
^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...epted from the households would lead to an reduction in of malinger of the public ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2763.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14525139665 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98596601631 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446927374302 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 883.8 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3279090091 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.70833333333 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333162886488 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104166492319 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136112422815 0.0758088955206 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245663890011 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.213677437731 0.0667264976115 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...various countries is an increasing one. The myriad of waste produced by the househo...
^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...uced by the households is proving to be a uge problem for the environment. Adding...
^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...epted from the households would lead to an reduction in of malinger of the public ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2763.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14525139665 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98596601631 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446927374302 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 883.8 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3279090091 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.70833333333 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333162886488 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104166492319 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136112422815 0.0758088955206 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245663890011 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.213677437731 0.0667264976115 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.