The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The table is about five major types of fast food eaten in Melbourne. It is obviously clear that the largest propotion of consumer spending in there went on hambuger, fried chicken and salad. On the other hand, fried rice and noodles has the lowest units in this.
The largest number of fast food consumed is hambuger. It went down from 40 in 2005 to 38 in the present. But in 2025, it has an increase in 13 units. Fried chicken has the second largest. it had an upward trend in 2 units from 2005 to present. And in the future, it will increase to 8 units. Salad stands at third place. In the past, it had only 5 units. However, nowadays, it has an increase to 15. In the near future, it will go up to 41 units.
Although fried rice and noodles are increasing, it has slowly speed. In 2005, both had 6 units . In spite of this, fried rice reaches a peak to 9 and noodles goes up to 8 in the present. In the future, fried rice maintains at 9 and noodles has a growth in 9, too.
In conclusion, we can see five major types of fast food eaten in Melbourne from 2005 to 2025. It has a rise in almost types in this box.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | AhaanIshaan | 11 | view |
| 2022-02-24 | Awadhesh Mourya | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | sahil singh | view | |
| 2021-08-27 | AhaanIshaan | 11 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | thaovy03032005 | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
.... Fried chicken has the second largest. it had an upward trend in 2 units from 200...
^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'sped', 'speeded'.
Suggestion: sped; speeded
...d noodles are increasing, it has slowly speed. In 2005, both had 6 units . In spite o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... slowly speed. In 2005, both had 6 units . In spite of this, fried rice reaches a ...
^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd noodles goes up to 8 in the present. In the future, fried rice maintains at 9 a...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and noodles has a growth in 9, too. In conclusion, we can see five major types...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... 2025. It has a rise in almost types in this box.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, third, in conclusion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.12328767123 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21610838265 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488584474886 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 1.53170731707 718% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 8.94146341463 212% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8203107078 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 47.5263157895 112.824112599 42% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.5263157895 22.9334400587 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0812841584605 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255177257699 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050239597927 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056568758472 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360054607578 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 3.7 13.2329268293 28% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 94.15 61.2550243902 154% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 2.9 10.3012195122 28% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 5.43 11.4140731707 48% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.2 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.4329268293 39% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 5.0 11.0658536585 45% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.