The readind passage and the lecture are both discussing genetic modification process to creat more trees and vegetables. The writer claims three benefits from applying this process. The lecturer contradicts each benefit which is given by articls.
First, the author states, geneticaly modified trees will be more resistant to disease. For example new pest - resistant papaya tree resist ring sot virus. The lecturer contraverses this statement. She says, natural growind trees susceptible to many hard conditions some species dead, some can resist harsh period. In genetic modified trees all have same response to bad weather or difficul condition. Moreover, if these trees can not withstand harsh condition, they will be all dead.
Second, the author asserts, genetic modified trees give economic benefits to one who grow them. This is as a result of rapid growth of these fruit or vegetables. The professor in the other hand challenges this argument. She mentions, seeds of genetically modified trees cost more than seeds of naturaly grow plants. Furthermore, farmer can not collect their seeds to plant these trees a gain. THey have tp pay for companies to get more seeds. In this case, these trees do not have such economic benefits as the articale said.
Finally, the readind passage points out, genetically modified trees can decrease over using of wild trees . many trees can cut down and replace very fast if they genetically treated. The professor refutes this statement. She states, genetically growth trees grow rapidly. In addition, they agrassively compete with other native trees for natural resourses. Therefore, they will damage orginal trees.
The readind passage and the lecture are both discussing genetic modification process to creat more trees and vegetables. The writer claims three benefits from applying this process. The lecturer contradicts each benefit which is given by articls.
First, the author states, geneticaly modified trees will be more resistant to disease. For example new pest - resistant papaya tree resist ring sot virus. The lecturer contravers this statement. She says, natural growind trees susbtable to many hard conditions some species dead, some can resist harsh period. In genetic modified trees all have same response to bad weather or diffical condition. Moreover, if these trees can not withstand harsh condition, they will be all dead.
Second, the author asserts, genetic modified trees give economioc benefits to one who grow them. This ia as a result of rapid growth of these fruit or vegetables. The professor in the other hand challenges this argument. She mentions, seeds ofgenetically modified trees cost more than seeds of naturaly grow plants. Furthermore, farmer can not collect their seeds to plant these trees a gain. THey have tp pay for companies to get more seeds. In this case, these trees do not have such economic benefits as the articale said.
Finally, the readind passage points out, genetically modified trees can decrease over using of wild trees . many trees can cut down and replace very fast if they genetically treated. The professor refutes this statement. She states, genetically growth trees grow rapidly. In addition, they agrassively compete with other native trees for natural resourses. Therefore, they will damage orginal trees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-09 | talelaldabous | 65 | view |
- The readind passage and the lecture are both discussing genetic modification process to creat more trees and vegetables The writer claims three benefits from applying this process The lecturer contradicts each benefit which is given by articls First the a 65
- The reading and lecturer are about the dinosaures if they wer considerd as endotherms enamel or not The endotherms are type of animals which can maintain its internal tempreture warmer than surrounding environment The the author states that the dinosaurs 76
- The readind passage and the lecture are both discussing declination of Torreya taxifoha trees in state of Florida The writer claims three solution to prodect these trees from declination However the lecturer contradicts author opinion She says ways mentio 71
- Government always fund many fields It support education and health Therefore government should spend money in very paramount things Whether the government should provid its support to arts or to athletcs as state sponsored teams this can be weighed in man 60
- The main topic in readind passage and lecture is about developing of international fund to help forest protection from deforestization The author claims benefits of tnternational fund to protect forests However the le3cturer casts doubt on claim made in a 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ee benefits from applying this process. The lecturer contradicts each benefit which...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conomic benefits as the articale said. Finally, the readind passage points out,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...es can decrease over using of wild trees . many trees can cut down and replace ve...
^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...can decrease over using of wild trees . many trees can cut down and replace very fa...
^^^^
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se over using of wild trees . many trees can cut down and replace very fast if th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37307692308 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56068187429 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611538461538 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1037902511 49.2860985944 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.5 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.8181818182 21.698381199 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.68181818182 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358342527039 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112133254756 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143736425917 0.0662205650399 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304569455712 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.322561124831 0.0443174109184 728% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.