The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public To what extent do you agree

Money is considered as a powerful tool in shaping the future of a country. There are conflicting views about whether the government funds should be utilised for conducting research on other planets or on the current serious issues the nation is facing. In my opinion, there are a plethora of concerns need to be taken into consideration instead thinking about other planets.

There are some people who aim to have a better life on a different planet as they say an ample of resources would be available there. This is because of the scientific researchers who have stated about the accessibility and availability of resources which are mandatory for living a life. On earth, due to excessive population, a number of problems are arising such as degradation of resources, pollution, decrease in accommodation etc owing to which they suggest the authorities should invest their funding in searching for alternatives. The more government invest in researches, the better the life will become in the future.

Conversely, there are myraid ongoing issues which need to be addressed. First and foremost, in developing and under developed countries, the government should priortise the investment in education sector because this is the biggest challenge there. Children do not acquire the skills which they should in order to excel in their careers at later stage. For instance, the literacy rate is 46% which is not even the half population. The second is the scarcity of employment opportunities which is resulting in exodus of people from villages to cities in search for a decent job. As a consequence, some serious issues are stemming not only for city-dwellers but also for agrarian areas. Therefore, it is a hurculean task for government to spend on big projects.

In conclusion, both sides seem to be good, however, making the first notion possible is an arduous task. I believe the current situation needs to be addressed on priority for the betterment of the society.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13003095975 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95120987012 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569659442724 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1433982653 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171203570352 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530267888357 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445754071313 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920338842303 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480872934305 0.056905535591 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.