People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature such as novels and poems. Do you agree or disagree with this idea?
Some advocates view that the situation that literature is taught to pupils in high schools is a waste of time. To the best of my knowledge, I completely disagree with this statement and will outline the reasons below.
For the most part, the impact that learning literature at high schools can be only seen as advantageous. The first rationale is that literature is set to play a pivotal role in building critical thinking and expanding the horizons of students. A typically prominent instance is that the writing skills in an academic way have been sharpened effectively through knowledge that can be studied in most of the forms of literature, especially novels and poems. Furthermore, should high-school students expand their minds and critical thinking by studying literature, success in their later life will be potentially increased.
On top of that, the second, and related, justification is that literature has been for a benefit of high school students to learn about social skills. Perhaps a good example would be that responsiveness and communication skills can be absorbed through reading famous masterpieces of literature and poetry. Furthermore, literary works encourage imagination and creativity. Should literature be eliminated from the curriculum of high schools, it is likely that the students will develop incompletely. Therefore, it is extremely essential for high school learners to continuously deepen their understanding of this subject.
It, therefore, can be concluded that with for the above-mentioned reasons, I entirely disagree with the view that high school students do not learn literature such as novels and poems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an academic way" with adverb for "academic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ent instance is that the writing skills in an academic way have been sharpened effectively through...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45703125 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13535150775 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55859375 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8625988132 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.416666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337795520833 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123384768442 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102117603021 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235159240233 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088274422023 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.