International tourism has brought about enormous benefits to many places. At the same time,
there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the
disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
It is disputed controversially whether international tourism offers greater benefits as compared to its drawbacks. From my perspective, I totally agree that its advantages outweigh the adverse impacts it brings and I will elucidate my point of view in the paragraphs below.
Firstly, the skyrocketed development of worldwide touristry richens the country and benefits citizens' life. As tourism improves, money from tourists worldwide flourishes to the country which helps contribute to the economy's dramatic growth. Besides, when a country's economy enhances, the money will be spent to advance other domains, for instance healthcare, labor or social security, that later on improve citizens' life. For example, it is scrutinized that Paris, a city well-known worldwide by its advanced tourism, is visited by 30 millions tourists every year, which contributes massively to France's economy.
Secondly, as tourism makes the country become more affluent, environmental and social issues certainly will be taken care of. The government will utilize money gained from touristry and other fields to extenuate environmental and social adversity, for instance, erecting campaigns to raise people's awareness and publishing regulations to protect its environment and people, which helps concern about local inhabitants and environment in the near future evanescent. Moreover, when aspects of environment, society, healthcare and more domains advance, a country will become more liveable and attracts more people internationally to visit or live and study in, which gives it a beneficial position and influence to other people around the world.
In conclusion, benefits of international tourism far outweighs its drawbacks due to the reasons I have mentioned previously.
- In recent years there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possib 89
- In recent years there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possib 89
- International tourism has brought about enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le, it is scrutinized that Paris, a city well-known worldwide by its advanced tou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79922779923 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08127460903 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6138996139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.6886511087 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.2 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214830623261 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875469821357 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713035937777 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148980802299 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638044580868 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.