Educating children by various sorts of punishment is causing growing concern. It is believed that juveniles should be trained to distinguish between right and wrong from the early stages of life. Thus, disciplinary penalties should be imposed directly on them to emphasize the mistake they made. In my view, both mental and physical punishments in some ways are unnecessary to raise a child’s awareness for those reasons.
To begin with, there is no point in punishing children to help them make a distinction between right and wrong due to their immaturity. At an early age, hardly do children understand their false beliefs nor activities on the grounds of not being mature enough. Children are full of curiosity, which leads to some wrongdoings on a regular basis. Therefore, punishing them is not optimal as preteens are not capable of comprehending their falsehood. In some Asian countries, for example, physical punishments are used as a prevalent method both at educational institutions and at home. However, the juveniles still have a tendency to imitate the misbehaviours since they could not figure out why the way they act is out of discipline.
On the other hand, harsh punishments might pose a threat to the children’s mental heaths. There is no denying that disciplinary penalties trigger psychological disorders. The more adults consider punishment as an efficient way of education, the more frustrated their children may be. When children are bombarded with harsh physical and mental punishment, they are more likely to face depression and anxiety. For these reasons, an alternative way of education has to be taken into consideration. Adults should prevent preteens from such poor attitudes by showing them the detriments of those activities and explaining the rooted reasons for these prohibited activities. Sorts of a suitable punishment for them could be silent treatment. When juveniles behave badly, it is necessary to isolate them. Being put in a solitary environment, it may strike to them that they have done something against the good merits.
To conclude, punishment is essential to help children learn the distinction between right and wrong. However, the way of imposing it on preteens is much more important. Other methods ought to be taken into account to make them realize the faults and fix them.
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct E g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 91
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shop and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Technology has brought so many changes that modern lifestyles are completely different from the way people lived in the past Do you think the positive effects of technology outweigh its disadvantages 56
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 836, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...em. Being put in a solitary environment, it may strike to them that they have don...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27005347594 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94275237314 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532085561497 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0923800733 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.5909090909 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 3.9879759519 426% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288010724891 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876565924249 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081684491204 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191400089103 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027423843554 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.