The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented line graph shows the quantity of waste generated by three companies in tonnes, from the year 2000 to 2015.
The amount of waste produced by Company C showed a steady but significant increase over the period of 15 years, while, both the other companies A and B experienced a downward trend.
In 2000, the waste produced by company C was 4 tonnes and showed a gradual increase in its production till 2005, reaching up to 6 tonnes. From the year 2005 to 2010, the rate of increase in annual production of waste was slower, but in 2010 it exceeded the production of Company B. In the next five years, the production rate had shown a steep increase in the graph, outraced the Company A's production and reached up to 10 tonnes by the year 2015.
Production of Company A and B started far from each other, 8 and 12 tonnes respectively, but seems to be converging on each other in the year 2005. Thus, the former showed decrement and increment by the latter, converging between 10 to 11 tonnes. For the remaining 10 years, Company B had experienced a dramatic decrease in its production, down to 3 tonnes only, whereas, Company A had shown a gradual decrease in its production, falling down to 8 tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Phuong1810 | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Phuong1810 | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | dorae | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status 19 78
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period Summarise 73
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61751152074 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72335024956 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470046082949 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.3667943269 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209928538866 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109763085678 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814749044566 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166958506213 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796054076927 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.