The two diagrams illustrate how a cinema has developed over the last few years.
Overall, there have been several changes, the biggest transformation is the addition of three cinema and convenience stores such as a DVD shop, food and drink store, and a relaxation room.
In 1980, only two cinemas, one on the left hand of the entrance and a second larger cinema which was located in the right corner next to the car park. On the right of the entrance lay the ticket and drinks counter which is on the bottom of cinema 2. There were also toilets in the back left of the building. Looking at the map today, cinema 2 was filled with three cinemas, with the original cinema 1 and 2 to move to the left hand. The change to cinema 1 was made to make way for a food and drink counter and a relaxing room. Besides, there was a new DVD stored in the right corner. The male and female restrooms and tickets remain unchanged
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 73
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
- Newspapers are less important nowadays because we have up to date access to the news on the internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding. Looking at the map today, cinema 2 was filled with three cinemas, with the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, look, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3918128655 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29415733871 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3464367653 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4444444444 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143957058786 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575167992118 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439846692661 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087039252092 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337391103224 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.