The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people contend that the media should attempt to convey more positive news to their audience. While I accept that delivering good news is beneficial, I believe there should be a balance between positive and negative information being shown on TV or other channels.
On the one hand, it is imperative to bring good news to viewers. Firstly, when receiving more positive information during the day, people can become more optimistic in their life. This improves their overall well-being, and they can enjoy their life more and have greater motivation for working or studying. Secondly, when the media reports news about good citizens who have accomplished something useful for the community, others will be stimulated to take the same action. For example, during the Covid-19 pandemic when many residents lost their income, a group of volunteers in Hanoi launched a campaign in which food and clothing were sent to needy people in deprived areas. This campaign was promoted widely on TV, which encouraged many other individuals to donate their money.
On the other hand, I believe the transmission of negative news is equally important. The first reason is that residents need to be aware of the threats going on around them, and they can therefore find ways to protect themselves and their families. For instance, when there is news about an accelerating number of cases of kidnapping in the area, parents will need to supervise their children more carefully when going out. Additionally, it is necessary for residents to acknowledge that there are still many acute problems such as pollution or corruption that need to be addressed, and they, as individuals, need to take drastic actions to mitigate these issues. If good news is dominant on the media, people may have a false belief that they do not need to do anything to improve the situation.
In conclusion, I believe that positive and negative pieces of news are equally crucial, and therefore they should share similar amounts of time on the media.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- More and more people want to own famous brands of cars clothes and other items What are the reasons for this Is this a negative or positive trend 78
- Crime rate in teenagers has increased dramatically in many countries in recent years What are the causes and what are the solutions 46
- Some people think that news has no connection with people s lives so it is a waste of time to read newspapers and watch television news programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to these places historical attractions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reports'' or 'report's'?
Suggestion: reports'; report's
...g or studying. Secondly, when the media reports news about good citizens who have accom...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09337349398 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67198895345 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53313253012 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5074604505 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.785714286 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1894657338 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760551255573 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571773438429 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128144019712 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278213801976 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.