Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
The author here claims that, it is the educational institutes’ responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing the field of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. I mostly disagree with this position regarded by the author for the following reasons mentioned further which I will elucidate below. Nevertheless, I do concede that educational institutes have a commendable role in shaping the students’ future.
First off, to pursue some kind of field of study is an individual choice, which is subjective. Every student is different and has different likings and interests. The choice of field of study wholly depends on the student and not on the educational institute. For instant, the teachers in the educational institute might suggest the students to pursue their careers in a field which might be in boom in the near future. Most of the students might agree to their professors and opt such a field. But there might be some extraordinary students who might just not agree with the professors and may choose a whole different field. It’s of course an individual decision of what field to study and it is hence the individuals’ responsibility for his own success.
In addition, the author here forgets the fact that there are thousands of students studying in the same institute. And the reason behind a particular individual choosing the institute is their interest in the curriculum provided by the institute. In such a case it is obviously not the institutes control over the student to choose the particular field of study. It is the student who has chosen the institution and by choosing the same he him selves decides the field of study. Hence, we cannot take in account the educational institute for the students’ failure to choose a field in which he/she is unlikely to succeed.
Just like they say every coin has two side the prompt above has another side as well. Yes, the educational institute might help a student choose the right path in which he/she may succeed I future. For example, let us say there is an engineering college, in the same there is a student constantly scoring less marks and has many backlogs. But the same individual is an outstanding artist. Here, the faculty in the institution might just guide the student to become an artist and perform arts rather than studying a field in which he is not likely to succeed in future. The educational institute might help to build a students’ bright future, but the institution is not responsible for the student to not succeed.
In conclusion, the educational institution must not be considered responsible for a students’ unlikeliness to succeed. Instead, it is the students responsibility for his/her success or failure.
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of local and 55
- The following appeared in an e mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville Over the past ten years there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre productio 69
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 58
- Homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last year that region experienced 90 days with below average temperatures and climate forecasters at Waymarsh University p 68
- The following appeared in an e mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville Over the past ten years there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre productio 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun marks is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e there is a student constantly scoring less marks and has many backlogs. But the sa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 559, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ld in which he is not likely to succeed in future. The educational institute might help t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...keliness to succeed. Instead, it is the students responsibility for his/her success or f...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2283.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05088495575 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94978051166 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41814159292 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6194185268 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.2608695652 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.652173913 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516547628805 0.243740707755 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165528299542 0.0831039109588 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149952784162 0.0758088955206 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32248934253 0.150359130593 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107150000473 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.