The presented diagram elucidates the production of clothes made from recycled materials namely plastic bottles.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the process has a total of 12 stages. It is also noticeable that the manufacture begins with intact plastic bottles and then ends up becoming clothing from recycled materials.
To begin with, plastic bottles are transported to factories that making recycled items. After moving to factories, plastic bottles are sorted to distinguish between usable and unusable ones. Afterward, usable bottles will be cut into pieces and then washed to make bottles cleaner. It is at this particular point that bottles that have been washed will be dried in the sunshine for 10 hours. Following that, dried bottles are boiled and strained to make rolls of yarn. Subsequently, yarn rolls will be weaved into the desired fabric that is suitable for making clothes, and weaved yarn will be rolled up into separated units. This is when products are nearby. Eventually, the process ends when the recycled fabric is manufactured into clothes.
- The table below gives information of weekly level of consumption by different age groups in ordinary milk and butter healthy alternative HA milk and butter in one European country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 84
- we are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future is it good for us to reply so much on computers 89
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32258064516 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62208660982 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606451612903 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3391672357 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254433657426 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114666983391 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615156131344 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16514390161 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018675528676 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.