Transportation is indeed a complex issue for the authority. From both the popular modes of transport, more money should be spend by the governments on railways instead of roads. If asked, I largely oppose such a notin. My inclination is justified in ensuing paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments to put forward my view point, principle one in favour of the development of road is that accesibility for all the citizens. Road network is not only widely distributed throughout the metropolitan, but also exist in the country side. Hence, it would be reliable for all the people as we can easily use our personal vehical to run on it. Unlike, railway can only able to travell from station to station. Another noticeable point is that expansion of road structures would be cost effective for the center. It can save a vast sum of money used in construction of the track, stations, electricity networks and locomotive used to run train.
Apart from that, few logical reasons could be attributed to ignore the promotion of railways. Firstly, popularity of train is gradually decreasing in society due to availability of fast moving motorbikes and cars. Using a personal car is now considered as a luxurious choice and social impact. As a result majority of public inclined toward ownership of this vehicle ran on the road. One recent survey carried out by the transport ministry of India has concluded that since 2015 there is not even little growth has been seen in the number of passenger; however, the improvement in facilities.
Nonetheless, I would not overlook other side too. Focussing on the metirs of the train, it is eco-friendly way of transportaion as compared to the road. Only small amount of space require for railway track which can save a lot of trees in the forest and renewable source of energy could also conserve fuel with less or negligible pollution.
Moreover, in this fast pace era, one can not only save ticket price but also save time via rail.
To summarise, nevertheless the railway is fruitful for environment and less time consuming method, my argument conceive that road is comparatively better if we consider economical affordability for government to build and easy to access for individuals.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 89
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 73
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student However there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to work Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college In your letterdescribe the situat 84
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Health experts believe that walking is a good exercise for health However people are walking less nowadays Why is this happening How can people be encouraged to walk more 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...odes of transport, more money should be spend by the governments on railways instead ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 630, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rack, stations, electricity networks and locomotive used to run train. Apart fr...
^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s a luxurious choice and social impact. As a result majority of public inclined to...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and easy to access for individuals.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, apart from, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92160649023 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60752688172 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.379092349 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111006227863 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303616472485 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049005645754 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0569245617725 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444462395073 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.