Some people are of the opinion that doing different things is not necessary in their whole life. Some are opposed to this idea, claiming that individuals should not act the same ways compared to others. While the former view can be justified for some reasons, I am inclined to the latter view.
I can understand why it might be beneficial to choose for the unchanged things in their lives. Advocates of this idea believe that change in another way may bring back a lot of drawbacks for their work or study. This appears to be because if they are to do new things in new ways at their workspace or schools, they will ignore some problems which they have to solve, and not give a great key solution; as a result, they can get lower marks or even lose earnings. Furthermore, they may prefer to be down-to-Earth and not ambitious. In fact, these people opt for a decent job or a medium goal, and there is no need to change their minds.
However, I would side with those who argued the aforementioned idea that it is of greater importance to do different things from others. It is very clear that changing could give us lots of advantages for our future. One possible consequence is that when they make the best of every opportunity to study harder or find out effective methods for your projects, they could acquire advanced knowledge and valuable experiences. Therefore, in the following years, they could apply for better vacancies of famous companies and get higher remuneration, also have bright career prospects. Another worth mentioning thing is that successful men always know how to change themselves in different ways compared to others. For example, Bill Gates, who is known as a billionaire, dropped out of school and opted for starting his own business and earned lots of fringe benefits.
In conclusion, changing is always possible. Although some avoid from changing, my firm conviction is change is better choice for all of us in the whole life.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79646017699 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63605923905 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581120943953 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2250793305 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253643124768 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896254389053 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06334641306 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163023690495 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351832529422 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79646017699 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63605923905 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581120943953 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2250793305 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253643124768 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896254389053 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06334641306 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163023690495 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351832529422 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.