1/ The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given line chart illustrates the number of foreign students and domestic students applying for universities in Australia from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that there was an increasing demand for Australian university education by overseas students. Meanwhile, the number of commencing Australian students fluctuated throughout the period. In addition, more local students applied for the universities than overseas students.
In 2001, the total number of local students was the highest, with 40,000 students, which doubled that of the foreign students. The quantity of Australian commencing students was about 18,000, roughly 1,000 higher than the figure for overseas freshmen.
From 2001 to 2010, more students who were born outside Australia enrolled in the universities, with its figure rocketed to around 80,000 students. Similarly, the total number of local students soared before staying unchanged at 60,000 students. In contrast, the figure for native beginners at universities remained low with a slight fluctuation, meanwhile, that for foreign commencing students grew steadily and peaked at 40,000 students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-08 | mrinal | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | smiley | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-03 | thaodim123 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | DRgio | 84 | view |
- Topic The pictures show the changes of a park from 1980 to the present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The maps give information about a university sports court 81
- The table shows data about underground railway system in six major cities with date opened kilometres of route and passenger number per year in millions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where releva 67
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86746987952 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83926086076 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9459419939 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195192423264 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109424865196 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411926913575 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146262453469 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047718817293 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.4140731707 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.